Tag Archives: Peter Scholze

Local representations occurring in cohomology

Michael Harris was in town for a few days, and we chatted about the relationship between my conjectures on completed cohomology groups with Emerton and the recent work of Scholze. The brief summary is that Scholze’s results are not naively … Continue reading →

Posted in Mathematics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Fundamental Curve of p-adic Hodge Theory, Part II

This is a second post from JW, following on from Part I. The Galois group of \(\mathbb{Q}_p\) as a geometric fundamental group. In this follow-up post, I’d like to relay something Peter Scholze told me last fall. It concerns the … Continue reading →

Posted in Mathematics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Scholze on Torsion, Part IV

This is a continuation of Part I, Part II, and Part III. I was planning to start talking about Chapter IV, instead, this will be a very soft introduction to a few lines on page 72. At this point, we … Continue reading →

Posted in Mathematics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Scholze on Torsion, Part III

This is a continuation of Part I and Part II. Before I continue along to section V.3, I want to discuss an approach to the problem of constructing Galois representations from the pre-Scholze days. Let’s continue with the same notation … Continue reading →

Posted in Mathematics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Scholze on Torsion, Part II

This is a sequel to Part I. Section V.1: Today we will talk about Chapter V. We will start with Theorem V.1.4. This is basically a summary of the construction of Galois representations in the RACSDC case, which follows, for … Continue reading →

Posted in Mathematics | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Scholze on Torsion, Part I

This is a sequel to this post, although as it turns out we still won’t actually get to anything substantial — or indeed anything beyond an introduction — in this post. Let me begin with some overview. Suppose that \(X … Continue reading →

Posted in Mathematics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

En Passant II

Let’s party like it’s 1995! The Boston conference on Fermat produced a wonderful book, but now you can watch the original videos. Some first impressions: some of you used to have more hair (not naming names). Forum of Mathematics Pi … Continue reading →

Posted in Mathematics, Waffle | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Scholze on Torsion 0

This will be the first zeroth of a series of posts talking about Scholze’s recent preprint, available here. This is mathematics which will, no question, have more impact in number theory than any recent paper I can think of. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Mathematics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment